MALIGAYANG PASKO SA INYONG LAHAT! MAHAL KO KAYO!
Pages
▼
Tuesday, December 24, 2013
Saturday, December 7, 2013
Review: Thy Womb (Sinapupunan)
BY CARLOS AGUILAR
DECEMBER 6, 2013
DECEMBER 6, 2013
INDIEWIRE
“Played by acclaimed actress Nora Aunor,
she carries the film through its many passages and depictions of the Bajau’s
lifestyle.”
----------o0o---------
----------o0o---------
Note: 'Thy Womb' is
the Philippines' hopeful entry for the Golden Globe Nomination for Best Foreign
Language Film. U.S. : None Yet. International Sales Agent: Solar Entertainment
Corporation
Giving birth to a
child is a defining moment in every woman’s life. It represents the fulfillment
of a biological purpose. It is also the promise of hope in a new being. Each
society across the globe infuses the miracle of motherhood with its own
particularities, but there is a unanimous appreciation and respect towards
mothers as symbols of prosperity and keepers of a continuous cycle of life.
Ironically in Brillante Mendoza’s film Thy Womb, the protagonist, a midwife
unable to bear a child for her husband, decides to find him a fit woman to
deliver him an heir. With immersive filmmaking and a breathtaking setting, this
slice of life feature transcends mere ethnography to bring to the screen an
augmented and visceral vision of reality.
Few words are
ever spoken by Shaleha (Nora Aunor ), but her expressive eyes convey a
religious peace and a love that knows no boundaries. Knowing that her partner
Bangas-An (Bembol Roco) is reluctant to adopt a child and aware that her
infertility won’t let her satisfy that necessity, she takes matters into her
own hands. What she needs is simply a surrogate mother, someone who can provide
him with such joy. Nonetheless, in this Bajau Muslim island community there are
rules to abide by, and finding a mother for her husband’s child essentially
means searching for a new wife. Lacking any sort of jealousy or selfishness
Shaleha’s unconditional love motivates her to help him find the right young
lady. Not only must they obtain permission from the woman’s family but they are
required to raise a sizable amount of money and goods as dowry. Together they
sell fish, trade, borrow and scrap as much as they can until they are able to
afford Bangas-An's new wife.
Rendered to help
others become mothers but never getting that opportunity herself, Shaleha is a
character fueled by faith and not tormented by the poising nature of human
desire. Played by acclaimed actress Nora Aunor, she carries the film through
its many passages and depictions of the Bajau’s lifestyle. Nurturing and
assertive she is indeed a woman more than capable of caring for a child, but
the cards she has been dealt require her to act with selflessness. Naturalistic
and minimal her performance resonates even in the silent and humble poetry that
permeate the images.
Relying upon a
basic storyline, the magic of the film lies in its design. Form is more
relevant here than any twist and turns in the plot. Arranged with an eclectic
cinematic grammar, the director incorporates aerial shots of the sea gypsy
community combined with underwater sequences, slow motion observational shots,
and seemingly traditional filmmaking that are always in motion, never static.
The camera is alive, it moves around this world with grace. It is also
completely conspicuous making the viewer aware of its presence. Mendoza places
his characters in the real world and films them, which creates a sort of raw
fiction that is neither entirely scripted or fully documentarian. Still, for all
the experimental elements he includes, Mendoza made a film about tradition that
simultaneously inspires a sense of discovery. Via its postcard-worthy
landscapes and all-consuming spirituality, Thy Womb is a film that revels in
its apparent simplicity, which makes for a compelling and revelatory piece. It
lets outsiders intrude into a place undamaged by modernity and functioning in
harmony despite being surrounded by external turmoil.
Friday, December 6, 2013
Tuesday, November 26, 2013
CALL FOR PAPERS: FORUM KRITIKA: GUY ON THE EDGE
CALL
FOR PAPERS
Forum Kritika: Guy on the Edge
Posted on November
25, 2013 / Filed under Call for Papers / Permalink
To describe Nora
Aunor as a fixture in Philippine cinema is like saying that Shakespeare knew
how to wield a pen. Of course a national cinema will be larger than the sum of
its stars, just as literature is much more than what its canonical authors
might suggest. But just as there will be writers and then there’s Bill (and Leo
and Virginia and a few Johns), contemporary Pinoy movies can already be
understood as featuring any number of stars, starting with that name, first and
foremost, and everyone else’s afterward.
As a Philippine
multimedia star, Nora Aunor (“Guy” to her fans) was sui generis, with Filipino
cultural observers, starting with Nick Joaquin, taking careful note of her
emergence, then barely as an adult. Her growth as a prominent performing artist
can be tracked in milestones that a large group of loyal devotees, now
dispersed in several countries, are able to recount from memory. A simplistic
way of explaining her success is that she had been extraordinarily gifted and
cannily aware of her strengths and limitations, so that she could identify
exactly which challenges she could excel in; a significant number of her
detractors would add that she had also been lucky as well as shrewd in
exploiting the right kind of people.
Nevertheless even
Aunor’s worst critics would be unable to deny her multifarious accomplishments
in film, theater, television, and musical recording, as well as her iconic
significance as a genuine one-of-the-masses type of phenomenon: rural poor,
dark-skinned, unruly and deeply ambivalent in her attitude toward the trappings
of success. In line with discussions of film auteurs and star texts initiated
by such publications as the Cahiers du Cinéma as well as scholars like Richard
Dyer and Christine Gledhill, Kritika Kultura will be covering the persona and
output of Nora Aunor as the topic of a forthcoming forum.
The forum invites
scholars of Philippine star-text studies, spectatorship, and the performing
arts to provide assessments of the person (and her persona) originally hailed
as the country’s first “superstar.” Paper proposals should be submitted
electronically to the forum editor, Joel David, at
<joelsky2000@yahoo.com>, no later than November 30, 2013. Any
contribution will be acknowledged within 48 hours of receipt. Authors whose
proposals are accepted should finalize their articles (5,000 to 7,000 words,
observing the sixth edition of the Modern Language Association handbook) on or
before January 31, 2014. These articles will then undergo the standard process
of double-blind peer review for academic journals.
Proposals should
consist of no longer than a one-page submission, comprising the following:
title of the submission; name(s), affiliation(s), and short description(s) of
the author(s) [up to a maximum of two per article]; topic area of the
submission; three or four keywords that describe the submission; contact information
comprising mailing address(es), e-mail address(es), and/or phone number(s); and
a single-paragraph paper proposal. Kindly note that fan studies may be
considered, but fan testimonials and hagiographic appreciations, no matter how
vital to the subject, will not in themselves be appropriate material for the
journal. For further inquiries, please contact the forum editor (email
<joelsky2000@yahoo.com>) or Kritika Kultura (email
<kritikakultura@gmail.com>, cc <kritikakultura@admu.edu.ph>,
<kritikakultura@yahoo.com>, and <vincenz.serrano@gmail.com>).
Source: Kritika
Kultura
http://kritikakultura.ateneo.net/call-for-papers/forum-kritika-guy-on-the-edge
Sunday, November 24, 2013
Thy Womb special screening (A benefit for Typhoon Haiyan/Yolanda victims)
Anthology
Film Archives
New
York, NY
----------o0o----------
Source: http://thywomb.bpt.me/
----------o0o---------
US Medical Support
LLC and Thigh High Production LLC, in association with Advancement for Rural
Kids, Inc present "Thy Womb" special screening for the benefit of
typhoon Haiyan/Yolanda victims.
We are raising
funds to help victims of the recent monster typhoon that hit the Philippines,
which left hundreds of thousands displaced from their homes and millions in
need of basic necessities like food and water.
Proceeds will go
to Capiz, a province in Western Visayas that's in a State of emergency. With
the help of Advancement for Rural Kids, Inc., they are providing emergency
feeding and relief to kids and their communities in rural Capiz. ARK is all
volunteer.
Brillante
Mendoza's "Thy Womb" is listed among the contenders for the Best
Foreign Film at the 2014 Golden Globes. This is a story of unconditional love
about a Bajau midwife coping with both the cultural burden and gendered irony
of her own infertility amid the deprivations of her gypsy community in
Tawi-Tawi, Philippines.
A saga of island
life stuck between the devil of passion and the deep blue sea of tradition.
The Screening Date
will be on
December 1, 2013 at
12:00 noon to 3:00pm
Thursday, November 21, 2013
PANAWAGAN NI ATE GUY: ALAY NG PAGMAMAHAL
Samahan po natin sa pagbangon ang mga
kapatid nating nasalanta ng bagyong Yolanda.
Sa sinumaman po na nagnanais na makiisa sa
Panawagan ni Ate Guy, maaari po kayong mag deposit sa account na ito:
Glorina Tugade
BPI S/A No.: 8469-0517-58
Canlubang, Laguna Branch
Paki-email po ang iyong deposit slip dito:
arthurofthechildjesus@gmail.com
Maraming maraming Salamat po!
NORA AUNOR
By: ISAGANI CRUZ
MINI
CRITIQUE
The
Philippine Star
Novemebr
14, 2013
---------o0o----------
----------o0o----------
Rumors
that Nora Aunor is about to be proclaimed National Artist have been circulating
the past few weeks. Everyone involved in the process of nomination is bound by
a vow of secrecy, but since I was not involved this year (I usually am), I can
speak freely about why I think Nora Aunor deserves the title.
I
actually nominated her for the title a long time ago, but was eventually voted
down, because there were, at that time, quite a number of film directors who
were deserving of the honor.
There
are still a few individuals who seriously question two things: first, why a
film actor should be a National Artist, and second, why Nora Aunor.
First,
that film is as much of an art as any of the other categories is clear. There
have been several film artists named as National Artists: Gerardo de Leon
(1982), Lino Brocka (1991), Ishmael Bernal (1999), Eddie Romero (2003),
Fernando Poe Jr. (2006), and Manuel Conde (2009).
All
these artists, however, were directors. Even Poe was named not only as an actor
but also as a director. The question remains why an actor (“actor” is the
politically correct term for all performers, male or female) can be a National
Artist. After all, in film theories during the last century, film was always
considered a director’s medium. It is the director who puts together the
elements of a film, acting being only one of those elements.
Poe,
however, opened the door to actors, because his achievement as an actor was
considerable. It is impossible to think of him only as a director; his iconic
image is that of both actor and director.
Homepage
( Article MRec ), pagematch: 1, sectionmatch: 1
The
early 20th century theories argued that the juxtaposition of images or sequence
of shots could make it appear that an actor was happy, sad, or angry (thereby
negating the actual emotion felt by the actor). That was last century. In this
century, thanks to newer theories of film, acting is now considered as much of
an art as that of a director. Actors actually take advanced degrees in acting,
such as the Associate in Fine Arts in Acting for Film of the New York Film
Academy. It has helped that several foreign actors have shown that they can
take on varied roles and still create credible and powerful characters.
No
one today should doubt that acting is an art.
The
second question is why Nora Aunor. There are other Filipino actors, after all,
that have shown similar versatility, depth of emotion, command of facial
expressions, subtlety of subtexts, and other elements of film acting.
Take
the list of skills that a great film actor should have, as Jeremiah Comey lists
them in “The Art of Film Acting,” namely, concentration, not knowing,
acceptance, giving and receiving, and relating. Each of these skills needs
years of training and experience. One wondrous thing about Nora Aunor is that
she has all of these skills, not because she had formal training (she briefly
studied the Stanislavski Method and acted in workshop-intensive PETA), but
because she had them from the very beginning. Even when she was just starting
out and had to take on juvenile roles, she already showed an instinctive grasp
of the art of acting.
My
1984 book, “Movie Times,” had her on the cover, for good reason: she acted in
many of the films I dissected. Although the chapters in that book dealt with
film directors (it was the 20th century, after all), I still had to discuss her
acting in the films by those directors. She was, in a sense, already pushing me
then to expand my idea of film art to cover not just directors but actors.
An
artist must be judged by her or his best works. (Otherwise, we would forget
Shakespeare, who wrote some really awful plays.) Nora Aunor will be remembered
forever for her roles in “Tatlong Taong Walang Diyos” (1976), “Bona” (1980),
“Himala” (1982), “The Flor Contemplacion Story” (1995), and “Thy Womb” (2012),
among others.
Nora
Aunor has been recognized through nominations and awards in the Berlin Film
Festival, Cairo Film Festival, and Venice Film Festival – all major film
festivals – as well as other film festivals in Australia, Belgium, Dubai,
Macau, Hong Kong, India, Italy, Russia, and Singapore. Needless to say, she has
won many times over all the Philippine awards possible.
These
are achievements on the level of art. I do not even mention her popular tags as
one of the Ten Asian Best Actresses of the Decade, the Actress of the Century,
the Philippines’ Best Actress of All Time, and of course “Superstar.”
Sunday, November 10, 2013
Bongga Ka ‘Day: The Legend of Nora Aunor
(This article was first published in
print in issue 20 of the Philippine Collegian on 12 December 2012.)
by Anton Chua
----------o0o----------
Source: http://www.philippinecollegian.org/bongga-ka-day-the-legend-of-nora-aunor/
----------o0o---------
A
young woman, clad in white, prays to the heavens to receive a vision of the
Virgin Mary. Silently, her beautiful almond eyes are placed in focus, then the
camera pulls back to show her kneeling and steady, until at last she is
completely visible, motionlessly in awe of her vision. It is here, in this
unspeaking moment, that she is at her most expressive.While this unfortunate
woman, Elsa, would go on to be fatally shot later in the film, the performance
behind the character would live on forever. In Ishmael Bernal’s masterpiece
Himala, Nora Aunor gives her most recognizable performance as faith healer
Elsa, in a role that parallels her own mythical nature.
Nora
Aunor ranks among the greatest of Filipino artists, endowed with such
superlative titles as “Superstar,” and conferred with a long list of awards,
the breadth of which could only be dreamed by other thespians.
More
than this, however, she is a figure of mythical proportions, larger than any of
her roles or even her own persona. Practically worshipped by fans, and
seemingly made to represent ideals larger than herself, Nora Aunor is an
unparalleled legend in the Filipino entertainment industry.
Ang
Totoong Buhay ni Pacita M.
Nora
Aunor, or “Ate Guy,” grew up as a member of the masses, a short, dark-skinned
girl who at the time could hardly be confused for a star. Her career began at a
radio singing competition in Naga, called Darigold Jamboree. Nora joined in
order to help her parents pay for her sister’s tuition. Winning this and many
other amateur competitions, she soon made it big as a professional singer, her
magnificent contralto delivering record-breaking sales.
She
also starred in her own TV series, a variety show, at first called the
Nora-Eddie Show when it was launched in 1967, and then renamed The Nora Aunor
Show in 1968, and was ultimately known as Superstar. Movie appearances
followed, with her nabbing her first FAMAS nomination in 1972 for the film And
God Smiled at Me. It was here, when she started to enter film, that the myth
began to take shape.
“There
is no Nora Aunor film that does not script her ‘own’ life,” writes Barnard
College professor Neferti Tadiar. These performances typically characterize her
as a lower-class martyr who values helping others and suffering for them in
service, mirroring her own humble beginnings. In becoming this myth, both her
own persona and her characters are elevated to heights that exceed how they
would otherwise been regarded.
This
semi-autobiographical nature of her films build a sense of aspiration from the
audience that is underscored and enhanced by Nora’s status as a very
down-to-earth celebrity, who looks or acts nothing like the tall mestiza beauty
queens who usually grace the silver screen. She is an everywoman, not a
goddess, but she was able to achieve all of these things through effort and
perseverance – and this makes all the difference to her fans.
T-Bird
at Ako
Certainly
there are many great actresses and singers out there with plenty of fans, but
Nora Aunor’s fanbase is of particular note. Noranians, as fans of the famed
actress are oft-called, are among the most enthusiastic and energetic fanbases
of any celebrity. They’d go as far as to threaten to stage a rally if their
star doesn’t win an award.
Reverence
of her image takes place at almost religious levels. Tadiar writes of a story
of a wealthy neighborhood in which daily life was disrupted, because all the
household maids had gone off to watch a nearby shooting at which Nora Aunor was
present. Art history professor Patrick Flores recounts statements from members
of the Grand Alliance for Nora Aunor Philippines, in which they “would affirm
that Nora Aunor is the sole reason they ‘spend countless hours, experiencing sleepless
nights, working day and night.’”
“The
social profile of Nora Aunor fans is usually characterized as lower class,
consisting of housemaids, slum dwellers, and market vendors; any wealthy Nora
fans are considered an exception to the rule,” writes Dr. Bliss Cua Lim of the
University of California, Irvine, in describing the Noranians.
Director
Cesar Buendia notes what immediately made Nora so special and celebrated: “She
became a hit when it was in vogue to be fair and mestiza. The fans were waiting
for someone they could identify with. She was like Manny [Pacquiao] in her
time. That, combined with phenomenal singing and acting talent made her a
superstar.” Behn Cervantes calls her “the Dark Pinay who toppled the White
Tisay,” saying that her ascendancy “coincided with the rise of rabid
nationalism during the late 1960s and early 1970s.”
Dr.
Lim writes that Nora is the only “short, dark, low-born actress in the
Philippines” to achieve as much success as she did, given the competition of
stars who were definitely tall, white, and of higher class. In being such, “she
seems to encapsulate the most progressive anti-colonial aspects of Filipino
masscult.”
Himala
Relative
to this myth, Nora the human is not quite so perfect; she supported Marcos in
the 1986 snap elections, pleaded guilty to drug charges, and endured money
problems and unemployment in the United States.However, her triumphant return
to the country in August 2011 reified the ontological aspect of the mythical
Nora Aunor figure.
“Bakya
temporality,” according to Tadiar, is when the social elite believe the poor
masses to be backwards in their culture and are unwilling to change, unready to
move forward. Nora, like her alter-ego Elsa, is a “heretical saint,” whose
trajectory is unlike anything the gatekeepers of high culture has ever
witnessed. In light of this, the heretic figure of Nora Aunor represents a
subversion of the elite’s almost-colonialist assertion that the poor are “not
ready” to advance or contribute.
The
value of the Nora Aunor mythical figure lies in how she maintains the hope of
those who suffer, who find themselves at the bottom rungs of the social ladder.
Interpassivity, in which people project themselves and their aspirations onto
people or objects, is described by philosopher Slavoj Zizek as the delegation
of sensation to the object. With the mythical figure of Nora Aunor as an
interpassive subject, one can see that her representation of the masses runs
far deeper than just being a source of inspiration. If Nora falters but gets back
on her feet, then it shows that someone like her can have faults but still
recover.
That
said, Nora and her characterizations never seem to extricate themselves from
their suffering. This is in sharp contrast to the characters of her
contemporary and rival, Vilma Santos, whose roles in films such as Sister
Stella L and Dekada ’70 depicted women who were empowered despite their
context, not simply remaining passive to their tribulation. The final heresy
lies in shattering the mythical figure of herself, in breaking the shackles of
the Nora persona and hurl the character of the martyred woman into the annals
of history once and for all. To borrow the title of one of her unfinished
projects – the sole copy of which is reportedly in her possession –that will be
Nora Aunor’s Greatest Performance. ●