REVIEW: ANG KWENTO NI MABUTI
REVIEW: Analytic
awe from Jason Pilapil Jacobo, a member of the Young Critics' Circle (YCC):
A world is
imagined to be more shapely when the geometric configuration of the sphere
takes over the idea of landscape. Or else terrain falls back into that ancient
conceit of flatness. Of course this historicizing belongs to the colonial
order, but the cartographic claim is enabling for those whose place on earth is
threatened by the techne of, let's say, geodesy. Such is the rift that needs to
be resolved by the eponymous character played by Nora Aunor in Mes de Guzman’s
Ang Kwento ni Mabuti.
The narrative
pursues the labors of a peasant woman who forages what remains of the verdure
of a piece of land that belongs to her clan but now needs to be ransomed from
certain laws which demarcate the earth and expel those who have long nurtured
it. Mabuti's mother (Josephina Estabillo) dreads the day that would find them
living in a hut suspended from a tree at the edge of a cliff, but Mabuti
refuses to succumb to that banishment from a sphere they have already emplotted
as sacred.
To anticipate the
good that is to come, and to internalize this practice of patience, Mabuti
assumes the role of the shaman: summoner of the spirits, interlocutor ofthe
elements, Aeolian harp on Nueva Vizcayan earth that plays the music of the
spheres. With saliva and stone, Mabuti converses with the pharmakon (poison) of
venom as the pharmakon (antidote) of devotion, bargains with the universe to
remove the contagion, and restitutes the order of benevolence. All shall be
well, because the world is enfolded into a state of grace. It may not be
visible, but the good, in God’s time, shall foreground itself. The figure that
completes the sphere is an embrace from the firmaments. Mabuti is a widow, and
her son (Arnold Reyes) and daughter (Mara Lopez) have been taken away from her by
metropolitan commerce and diasporic exchange, but with crone-mother and four
elfin girl-grandchildren, the shaman asserts the insurmountable place of
sympathy in a world that must wax in fortitude when fortune is on the wane.
Mes de Guzman has
crafted a film whose milieu musters the enclosures and the extensions of what
could be the scope of a cinema of a considerable degree of independence: the
sphere of a locality whose roots and rhizomes can only allow the cosmos to open
itself up to both providence and peril, which includes a bridge that is never
completed, and military checkpoints which must delay travel into the city. The
agon that emerges out of the depths must tilt fate toward disaster or away from
it. This cusp allows the hailstone to hold within its core a precipitate of
insight on cosmic change and the swarm to hover above the ambivalence of an
ethic. This “dialectical image” empowers the writing to pursue the mystique
against all manner of mystifying. The crisis then is only fomented not to threaten
the place of the good but to test the ground on which its matter could speak.
The money that
Mabuti inherits from Nelia (Sue Prado), a woman summoned and surrendered by the
local insurgency, is not so much a metaphor of corruption but a metonym of corruptibility.
The spell around the cash stolen from possibly the same bank that is keeping
the title of Mabuti’s ancestral land may enchant the shaman. It is her
misrecognition of the sorcery that must be apprehended. The good is intimated
in the promise of goods, but only after the fetish about capital decays. Hence,
two prospects from within Mabuti’s sphere appeal as objects of the gift: the
four girl-children’s collegiate education and the crone-mother’s recovery from
metastasis. And yet, these options remain improvident. When Mabutifinally
resolves the compromise, the categorical imperative divorces itself from any
possible imperial category. Mabuti is not turned into a philanthropist.At that
moment, the exchange value is hinged upon the girl-child Marife, the daughter
of the insurgent who sneaks the money inside Mabuti’s bag before sheis killed
by the military. Marife’s term of ransom may be fiscalized by a known amount,
but it can only be accounted for by an interminable capacity—Mabuti herself—the
only sympathy that can correspond to the girl-child’s subaltern state.
The sanction of
this ethic is suffered with an elegiac pace by the syntax of the sympathy, Nora
Aunor. Her understanding of the pastoral is accurate, and almost exact in
calibrating a sense of biome whose radii are aware of catastrophe and attentive
to the fulfillment of the shamanic mandate. It is a range that understands both
limit and infinity. Aunor’s formal attitude is most assured here, then. Her
late style has become an archive of attunements that can relate with either
primordial kernel or final foliage. Earthen is the range. Because she is
comfortable treading the reed-path with swine, we forget the contempt we have
attached to the animal, and our zootropy recuperates.
We have been
instructed well on how Aunor enacts a moment of conviction to tell a truth or
to release oneself from victimry, but the method of her act in this film homes
in on crisis: the tentativity that surrounds its valences, the articulations of
a dilemma that nonetheless electrifies the spirit, and that static moment where
the only charge that matters is the epiphanic self.
Is anyone else
capable of shifting into tenses of terror perfect and progressive upon finding
out the excess in one’s baggage is money, money, money?
The ensemble of
women that accompanies this performance must be celebrated for providing Aunor
with formidable foils to her character’s predicament. Josephina Estabillo, the
termagant, is such a levity. Sue Prado, the renegade, is imperturbable. Mara
Lopez, the lovelorn, is by turns melancholic and sanguine. Not every seasoned
performer knows the difference.
Ang Kwento ni
Mabuti reveals to us that there are still stars, and the stars are still, in
Nora’s eyes. Superstars, they remain. And we must gaze, gaze, gaze.